Apache Cassandra vs. NoSQL Databases

Nowadays, companies are extensively depending upon databases that can efficiently handle large amounts of data while ensuring speed, scalability, and reliability. Currently, NoSQL databases have been gaining huge popularity among different industries due to their flexible features required for supporting modern applications. There are various NoSQL databases like MongoDB, Couchbase, DynamoDB, etc., that are available, but Apache Cassandra stands as the leader due to its high performance and unmatched scalability features. 

 In this blog, we are going to talk about Apache Cassandra vs. NoSQL databases with their features and benefits. 

What is Apache Cassandra?

Apache Cassandra was originally developed by Facebook. It is defined as an open-source, distributed NoSQL database storage system that can handle large amounts of data for multiple commodity servers with high availability without any single point of failure. Cassandra is highly capable of handling structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. It is extensively used by applications where real-time performance and scalability are required. 

 Key Benefits and Features of Apache Cassandra

•  High Availability & Fault Tolerance:

Cassandra has a robust distributed architecture, which makes it highly available. It enables automatic replication of the data across multiple nodes and eliminates the chance of any node failure. In case of node failure, it automatically retrieves data via other available nodes. 

• Horizontal Scalability

It has an outstanding horizontal scalability feature that allows businesses to add new nodes as the demand increases. Cassandra can easily handle growing data volumes and traffic without any disruption and downtime. 

• High-Performance

Cassandra is developed to deliver high performance even when there is a heavy workload. Due to peer-to-peer architecture, it can parallelly process and eliminate the risk of bottlenecks. With the help of a log structure engine, Cassandra is capable of providing fast read and write operations. This engine allows Cassandra to write all data changes in the append-only log for quick and efficient writing operations for random data access. 

• Flexible Data Model

Cassandra is equipped with a flexible data model that enables it to handle semi-structured, structured, and unstructured data models without affecting the application’s performance. Data is stored in column families that offer efficient storage and retrieval. It makes Cassandra an apt option for use cases where frequent updates or changes are required for the data model. 

Do you want to know about the latest features of Cassandra 5.0? Click the link to read our blog: https://www.ksolves.com/blog/big-data/apache-cassandra/apache-cassandra-5-0-new-features-and-updates

Apache Cassandra vs. NoSQL Databases

 There are various known NoSQL databases available in the market that create confusion about which one is right for you. Here we are comparing Cassandra with other NoSQL databases to understand what makes it different: 

Apache Cassandra vs. MongoDB

 Both of these databases are developed to handle huge amounts of unstructured data, but they have some key differences. 

• • Scalability: Apache Cassandra and MongoDB are used to scale horizontally, but Cassandra is more capable of handling large and high-velocity workloads easily and efficiently. MongoDB is also used to scale horizontally but faces difficulty in handling large-volume data for heavy workloads writing.
  • Consistency: Cassandra is based on an eventual consistency model that can work on inconsistent data in some cases. On the other side, MongoDB provides strong consistency that works on consistent data at all times. 
  • Data Model: Cassandra uses the column-based model. It stores the data in tables like relational databases, but with more flexibility. It suitable option for time-series data, logging, and applications with high write throughput. On the other hand, MongoDB uses a document-oriented model. It stores the data as JSO,N similar to a BSON document. It is an apt choice for flexible, dynamic schemas like content management systems and real-time applications.

Apache Cassandra vs. Couchbase

Here we are comparing Cassandra with the Couchbase NoSQL database at some key differences that are:

• • Scalability: Both of these databases are capable of handling horizontal scaling by adding more nodes to a cluster. But Cassandra has a ring-based architecture, which makes it more flexible and precise in its management of data distribution and replication. On the other hand, Couchbase’s master-slave model may lead to higher write delays and less consistent performance as the cluster size increases.
  • Consistency: Cassandra uses an eventual consistency model, which prioritizes scalability and availability but may occasionally result in temporary data inconsistencies. On the other hand, Couchbase ensures strong consistency that provides accurate data at all times, but it may not scale as effectively as Cassandra for extremely large distributed systems.
  • Data Model: Cassandra’s data model follows the column family model, whereas Couchbase is based on a document-oriented model. It directly impacts how data is stored and accessed in each database.

Apache Cassandra vs. HBase

 HBase is an open-source NoSQL database commonly used for big data applications. 

• • Scalability: Both of these databases are also developed to scale horizontally by adding more servers to the cluster. However, Cassandra has a greater ability to manage high-velocity data workloads, which makes it ideal for real-time applications.
  • Consistency: Cassandra follows an eventual consistency model that offers more priority to availability and scalability but may result in temporary inconsistencies in data across nodes. On the other side, HBase offers strong consistency, which means all read and write operations reflect the most recent data.
  • Data Model: HBases utilizes a key-value model that stores the data in rows and is identified by unique keys. On the other hand, Cassandra uses a column-family data model where data is organized into rows and columns within tables. This structure provides better flexibility to handle complex data queries and relationships.

Apache Cassandra vs. Redis

Redis, an in-memory NoSQL database, is widely used for caching and real-time applications. The key distinctions between Redis and Apache Cassandra are:

• • Scalability: Cassandra is mainly developed for handling large-scale workloads that ensure linear scalability for high throughput and petabyte-scale storage. On the other side, Redis may face challenges while scaling with very large datasets. 
  • Consistency: Cassandra follows an eventual consistency model to provide higher availability and fault tolerance in distributed setups. Redis provides strong consistency to ensure the availability of the latest data.
  • Data Model: Cassandra’s column-family model organizes data in tables, which makes it a suitable choice for structured data, logging, and high-volume transactional systems. Redis uses a key-value model and supports complex data structures like lists and sets, which is ideal for caching, session management, and real-time analytics.

Apache Cassandra vs. Other Databases: Simplified Comparison

Conclusion

Each NoSQL database has its strengths and weaknesses, but Apache Cassandra is an ideal distributed NoSQL database for applications that need high scalability and the ability to handle huge amounts of data with high-velocity workloads. Its great fault tolerance capability and flexibility for managing vast amounts of data make it a top choice for different organizations. 

If you are also looking for an Apache Cassandra support service provider for your business needs, then contact our certified professionals. At Ksolves, we are backed by a highly experienced and knowledgeable team of certified professionals who can provide customized Big Data solutions for your business. Contact us to get professional Apache Cassandra services from experts.